Random venom

On the wide Sargasso sea that is the internet we are free to send messages in bottles, hoping they will arrive and be read by particular people, perhaps even total strangers, Some prefer to send off Molotov cocktails, I guess just to prove that they, the sender, really exist. 

I got an email from a stranger last week (let’s call her Susan Dollinger, since that’s her name) of the latter type. Susan said she had come upon my site “by accident” (statistically improbable but whatever) and went on to say that she had read a bit, concluded that we were the same age, and then said, “Did you ever get a life? You seem like one of the lost men of our generation.”

I know, you’re supposed to delete such random bits of venom but instead I let it rile me up and blow on my already hot coals of insecurity. I looked at my last few posts — was she a Catholic? A Republican? Then I thought maybe she had been reading some of the memoir pieces, filled as they are with tales of drugs & despair, alcoholism & blarney — until I realized what a fool I had been. 

Random venom is the cancer of the internet; it flows through its blood stream along with porn and the spam, seeking a vulnerable, neurotic target like me. Sometimes, because of the ageless nature of everything online, people will write about things I wrote decades ago. A piece I did for Salon on Bobby Blue Bland just prompted a snarky message from someone who seemed to think I was condescending to the man, and I wanted to write and say that he’d missed the point — until I remembered the nice note I had received from Bland’s manager back then, saying how well he thought I had captured the singer’s appeal. 

We choose in this life: pick up the dead flowers or leave them where they lay. For every crank out there looking to spread his misery around there is always someone else who took something good away from what you wrote. My favorite was from a guy who read a piece in Glamour I had written about my daughter eleven years ago. It was a crazy bit of father hysteria driven by that sense of loss we all anticipate as parents: I know you’re going to leave me! He’d been so impressed with it that he kept the clip all these years, not because he was an editor or a fellow writer but rather another father, trying to understand the mystery of their bond. 

“I worry about her going to college and moving on to live her own life and I worry about how much I’m going to miss her,” he wrote, and then added, “I think that I’m going to put away your article for a while…  I know that it will make me smile yet again and hopefully, it will keep me from worrying too much.”

This is why we write, I thought; to make that connection, have that message in the bottle read. It may not seem like much of a life but it makes me feel a little less stranded, knowing there are others on islands like me, every bit as lost. 

Balm in Gilead

I didn’t go to church when I was a kid (which probably explains my moral laxity in many matters). My mother and father were lapsed Catholics and Protestants, respectively, and agreed on at least one thing: that their children should never have to endure the heaven-and-hell dissertations that made their Sundays so tedious. 

But every now and then I go to a Protestant church with my wife, who’s sort of an occasional Christian herself (though I am sure she would object to being described that way). She became a member of the First Presbyterian Church in Brooklyn Heights before we adopted our daughter, 15 years ago, and it has seen us through some difficult days since. We went the Sunday after 9.11 and the reverend gave the service over to the congregation, who took turns picking song from the hymnals. “America the Beautiful” was in there and I remember choking back the tears as we sang. (I also remember describing that moment to one of my Salon friends in SF who had written to ask how we were doing in the wake of that disaster. I think the combination of church and patriotism scared her off and I never heard from her again — the cultural divide in microcosm.)

Today seemed such a day, for all the right reasons; we wanted to share some of that overwhelming emotion we’ve all been experiencing since Tuesday but, seeing as how we were running late in typical Sunday fashion, we attended services at the Lafayette Presbyterian Church around the corner from us in Fort Greene. It’s a church with a lot of history: founding pastor Theodore Ledyard Cuyler was a militant abolitionist in the days before the Civil War, and Cuyler later invited a woman, the Quaker preacher Sarah Smiley, to preach from his pulpit. It was a first for a Presbyterian church and Cuyler was accused of heresy. It’s still a multiracial, multi-cultural kind of church and sure enough, Obama’s name was mentioned from the pulpit and the pews.

I never know what I’m looking for when I go to church so I’m always surprised when it finds me. Today it was while singing the old slave spiritual, “There Is a Balm In Gilead” — “Sometimes I feel discouraged/And think my work’s in vain…” Sometimes I do, too — about once a day, usually, and it’s worse on weekends when I have to go to dinner parties and listen to the stories of other people’s success. But having been one of the millions who labored to help get Obama elected — volunteering, blogging, talking about him to anyone who would listen for about a year now — I could feel, for once, that my work had not been in vain. We finally have a president we can be proud of. 

Of course, not all congregations were so happy today.  My niece Emily, who goes to college in Texas, has a roommate who was very upset. Her mom told her to finish school quickly and head home because the abomination of an Obama nation was a sure sign that “The End of Days is at hand!” But wait — isn’t that supposed to be a good thing? Doesn’t that herald the return of Christ? Someone needs to explain that to me. In the meanwhile, I’ll keep swaying and clapping, singing with the choir. 

Later, hater

It’s not too early for members of the GOP to start blaming each other for Tuesday’s defeat — actually, rivals in McCain and Palin’s camps started weeks before the election — and from the sidelines it’s already making for some entertaining chatter. The very notion that the Alaskan governor could be the next face of the Republican party is sparking an extreme reaction. 

Fox News’ Carl Cameron reported yesterday that people in McCain’s camp swear that Palin did not know which countries are in NAFTA (the whole “North America” part might have tipped her off) or that Africa was a continent and not a country. And this from the people who have labeled the media as snarky and disrespectful in its coverage of McCain’s vice-presidential pick. 

What I’m hoping is that when the cannibals get done feeding on the clowns (“Does this taste funny to you?”) the deeper thinkers in the party will commence to contemplate their future. Some have already spoken of the unholy alliance between born-again, anti-intellectual red-meat reactionaries and the heirs of the “party of ideas” that arguably began with William Buckley. (That Buckley’s son was abandoned by the magazine his father started for having the temerity to endorse Obama — in a Tina Brown-edited, Barry Diller-owned publication no less — was one of the many ironies of conservatism’s collapse.) Do they have a common platform? And what might it look like?

One thing is obvious: it’s going to take more than hate. Simply saying no to whatever Obama and the Democratic congress proposes won’t work, not just because of the majority (not filibuster-proof but compelling enough to get some moderate Republicans to come along on key legislation) but because of the mood of the country. If people were as scared of taxes as Grover Norquist is, they would not have elected a candidate who pretty much guaranteed years of sacrifice, and all but promised financial hardship. 

Americans, it seems, don’t hate government: They hate government that doesn’t work, that abandons its citizens in the wake of natural disasters, and looks the other way when people profit off of man-made ones, whether it be Wall Street or Halliburton. As we return to a belief in our system, and our role in it, the right will have to come up with more than “nope” to counter hope, and try not to get deranged in the face of change. Rush Limbaugh has already vowed to be the voice of all those who did not vote for Obama. You know: losers.  

 

Fort Obama

We hit the streets, along with most of Fort Greene, after 11:30, nearly a half hour after CNN and MSNBC called the election and the shouting and screaming and crying and hollering had begun to spill out of the houses, lungs too full for indoors. My election night party had peeled off until we had a hard core of the faithful, going from one TV to another, until we began to see our neighborhood reflected in the outer world: local hero Spike Lee was on CNN speaking of voting in Fort Greene before getting on a plane to go to Chicago and I figured if he could go that far, the least we could do was head for the corner. 

There, at South Portland and Lafayette, traffic was blocked in what looked like the opposite of a riot: cars were stopped by revelers but no one was fighting: everyone was shouting in unison, crying, laughing, chanting, holding up signs and cardboard cutouts of the candidate’s face. For a moment we were all Obama.

I heard from my sister in Texas that many reacted as if it were the end of the world. Now you know how we felt for, oh, eight years; the difference is we won’t punish them, we won’t think them unAmerican if they don’t agree with us. And President Obama (say it with me) will be their president too, just as he promised in his beautiful speech. (At least when we talked of leaving the country — after Nixon, Reagan, Bush, Bush — we kind of liked the idea; most conservatives would rather die than live in France.)

My friend Jess Greenbaum went to Harlem and couldn’t make it here but she sent me a message of huzzah. She had said something about how friends and family needed to be in touch with each other not just on the 9.11 disaster days but the opposite, the days of celebration and hope. For me, for so many of us who have fought and prayed for this victory, yesterday was like that. If 9.11 was our world turned upside down, Obama’s victory helped right it. I’m not used to seeing my country like this. Excuse me, there’s something in my eye. 

McCain’s Concession Speech

Did you catch the senator from Arizona’s valedictory remarks on SNL last night? Parodying himself, as Tina Fey stood beside him and parodied Sarah Palin, McCain acted as if his candidacy was washed up and he had to resort to selling “Fine Gold” and other campaign mementoes on QVC. (Using his Stepford wife Cindy as the hand model was a stroke of genius.) This was meant to remind us that he has a sense of humor — and I hope that these are the images of JMC that I’m left with — even as the jokes reminded us of how ill-fitting the GOP mantle has been on this candidate.

“I’m a true maverick,” he said, “a Republican without money.” It reminded me of a day long ago, when I was in college and a friend of mine saw a book I was reading for class, Michael Gold’s Lower-East-Side saga, Jews Without Money.  

“There’s something you don’t see very often,” he cracked — a remark he could get away because he was Jewish and (unlike almost everyone else I knew) had money. But when McCain makes a joke about the stereotype of rich Republicans he reminds us both that a) he is one and b) his party’s appeal to the working class is, at times, a rather cynical one. The popularity of the GOP since Reagan has been based in part on poor people who wanted to get rich (like Reagan, like Trump). But now that even the richest are facing the prospect of becoming poor (or at least middle-class), while the poor are facing the prospect of bubkes, the promise of fine gold rings hollow. As hollow as that stuff they hawk on QVC. 

Of course it’s a modern tradition for the candidates to make fun of themselves in the run-up to the election. The humor-challenged Richard Nixon helped clinch the ’68 election by appearing on Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In (his opponent, Hubert Humphrey, declined) and playing off the square he was (“Sock it to me?“) But McCain has a sense of humor, one that has been notably absent in the debates and many of his speeches in recent months.  

But I don’t buy this business about the “real McCain” — you know, the decent honorable guy that his friends are all awaiting the return of. As long as we’re talking TV here, it occurred to me watching the season finale of Mad Men last week that what linked this show to the last one Matthew Weiner labored on, The Sopranos, was that its characters were defined by their actions. They could talk funny or cynical or earnest or awful but it was how they acted when everything was on the line that mattered. 

No one made John McCain choose Sarah Palin. No one forced him to bring up such non-starters as William Ayers & Acorn, hoping to scare voters. No one told him to question Obama’s patriotism. And I’m sure no one dragged him back to Rockefeller Center either; his better angel has a sense of humor but has to be put in the line-up with all those demons when the time comes to weigh him as a presidential pick. Sock it to him.