McCain’s Concession Speech

Did you catch the senator from Arizona’s valedictory remarks on SNL last night? Parodying himself, as Tina Fey stood beside him and parodied Sarah Palin, McCain acted as if his candidacy was washed up and he had to resort to selling “Fine Gold” and other campaign mementoes on QVC. (Using his Stepford wife Cindy as the hand model was a stroke of genius.) This was meant to remind us that he has a sense of humor — and I hope that these are the images of JMC that I’m left with — even as the jokes reminded us of how ill-fitting the GOP mantle has been on this candidate.

“I’m a true maverick,” he said, “a Republican without money.” It reminded me of a day long ago, when I was in college and a friend of mine saw a book I was reading for class, Michael Gold’s Lower-East-Side saga, Jews Without Money.  

“There’s something you don’t see very often,” he cracked — a remark he could get away because he was Jewish and (unlike almost everyone else I knew) had money. But when McCain makes a joke about the stereotype of rich Republicans he reminds us both that a) he is one and b) his party’s appeal to the working class is, at times, a rather cynical one. The popularity of the GOP since Reagan has been based in part on poor people who wanted to get rich (like Reagan, like Trump). But now that even the richest are facing the prospect of becoming poor (or at least middle-class), while the poor are facing the prospect of bubkes, the promise of fine gold rings hollow. As hollow as that stuff they hawk on QVC. 

Of course it’s a modern tradition for the candidates to make fun of themselves in the run-up to the election. The humor-challenged Richard Nixon helped clinch the ’68 election by appearing on Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In (his opponent, Hubert Humphrey, declined) and playing off the square he was (“Sock it to me?“) But McCain has a sense of humor, one that has been notably absent in the debates and many of his speeches in recent months.  

But I don’t buy this business about the “real McCain” — you know, the decent honorable guy that his friends are all awaiting the return of. As long as we’re talking TV here, it occurred to me watching the season finale of Mad Men last week that what linked this show to the last one Matthew Weiner labored on, The Sopranos, was that its characters were defined by their actions. They could talk funny or cynical or earnest or awful but it was how they acted when everything was on the line that mattered. 

No one made John McCain choose Sarah Palin. No one forced him to bring up such non-starters as William Ayers & Acorn, hoping to scare voters. No one told him to question Obama’s patriotism. And I’m sure no one dragged him back to Rockefeller Center either; his better angel has a sense of humor but has to be put in the line-up with all those demons when the time comes to weigh him as a presidential pick. Sock it to him.

Ghosts of elections past

If you are looking for giant spider webs, life-sized ghouls or plastic tombstones to adorn your front lawn with, I’m afraid they’re all in Northeast Philadelphia. The voters whose doors I was knocking on may be facing hard times but they’re still looking to give away candy on Halloween. These neighborhoods must be fun for the kids; they’re very family-oriented and many houses are haunted.

Haunted by the past, that is: the time when people had steady work and were optimistic about the future, their kids’ college prospects and their own retirement. Most of the voters I spoke with were talking about the economy, the scare they got when they opened their last 401K statement (George Will said “the Obama campaign is benefiting from a mass mailing they did not pay for”). One dad I talked to, the only black voter I met on my wandering, told me to save my convincing for someone else. “I’m convinced every time I talk to my daughter who’s stationed in Iraq and can’t come home,” he said. “I’m convinced every time I look at my bank statement.”

Many I talked to were close to retirement — or so they previously thought. The idea that McCain supported privatizing Social Security was enough to galvanize them, if they weren’t already. The idea of having their money tied to the volatile stock market was far scarier than those Obama masks they’re selling. 

Health insurance was a big topic, too. There was a woman who told me both she and her husband were voting Democratic but their son, also on my list, was in a vegetative state. (“You can put him down too, if you want,” she said.) There was another mom, thinking of abandoning the Republican party for the first time, whose son had been on a methadone program, since closed: she was plenty scared, too. And there was the woman I met whose hair was missing from chemo. She was wearing a Phillies jersey and knitting a giant Phillies stocking as we talked. “Today’s a good day,” she said. “On good days I have enough energy to get mad at the Republicans.”

The fact that their team is heading for the World Series has made a lot of people happy; signs were everywhere and I even met a cat named Philly. One guy, mowing his lawn, stopped to tell me he and his wife were for Obama all the way and he was making a point of talking to his friends who were on the fence. Hearing I was from NY he shook his head about the fate of the Mets. 

“I tell you what,” I said. “You vote for Obama and I’ll root for the Phillies.”

That’s a promise that’s easy to keep when they’re playing the Devil Rays.

Prince of stakes

I just got back from a weekend of canvassing in Northeast Philadelphia and was happy to find myself a little more welcome this time. During the primaries in April I was ringing some of those same bells and meeting a lot of resistance from Hillary supporters, and she ended up surfing on their love like a rock star stage diving into a most pit: She beat us there soundly, taking nearly 75% of the Democratic vote. 

A lot of those folks told me they had reservations about Obama then, but that they would support him in the general election, and lo: Obama-Biden signs festooned many of the lawns in those neighborhoods, which range socio-economically from solidly middle class to just barely making it. (There were plenty of McCain signs, too, sometimes on the same lawns, and knocking on some of those doors — the doorbells were often broken — I found a house divided, family members split between our man and JMC.)

The tactic this time was to ask targeted voters which issues were foremost for them as the election approached, and not surprisingly the economy was number one. Layoffs and unemployment were a common theme, and the anger they engendered was largely directed at the party in power. In some cases that anger seems to have morphed into anomie: I smelled pot at a few homes, middle-aged guys baking in front of the TV set in the middle of the afternoon, pulling the hole in behind them as they sank. 

The stakes are high in Philly: the staffer running our district informed the volunteers (nearly all carpetbaggers from Brooklyn) that Kerry had carried Philadelphia by 80% in the last election — and they estimated Obama would need closer to 85% of the vote to carry the state. That’s a lot of angry white guys voting for a cool black dude, something unimaginable in previous years. 

But this isn’t previous years. For a lot of these folks, the ship is already sinking and they were ready to try something new. As one of the more visible Democratic signs said simply, “Had Enough?” Even those who saw McCain as separate from his party had to admit he was fronting the same team that had stood by as the walls collapsed and the building burned, and they are ready to change the pitcher, if not the whole team. 

Saturday night, after hitting about a hundred households, I ate an early dinner at a Northeast cheese steak joint called Steve’s Prince of Steaks. The choices are pretty simple — with or without onions? American cheese or Whiz? — and though most of the crowd there did not smile at the sight of my Obama button, they didn’t tell me to go to hell, either. This is also a simple choice. 

Action painting

After casting about for a new identity in the wake of the tanking financial markets, John McCain seems to have hit on a role he plans on sticking with, for a few days at least: magical thinker. Even as the darkening clouds are making many wonder about the very solvency of the government itself, the Arizona senator told the New York Times and CNBC today that he was going ahead with his tax cut plans. “Contrary to the warnings of fiscal analysts, he said he believed he could do so and balance the federal budget, which was falling deeper into deficit even before the financial crisis, by the end of his first term,” said the Times. 

Analysts! Analyze this, baby. In McCain’s world view there are a limited number of forces that really matter: The Surge, of course, the doubling-down of troops in Iraq that he alone championed last year, and that now promises to allow us to stay there long after anyone dreamed we would need to; and congressional earmarks, which are little bits of secret spending that senators and representatives attach to otherwise decent bills in order to get their constituents more of your money. 

The fact that your money is their money — that you are, in essence, them — should not confuse you. It doesn’t confuse McCain! He stood there while some Vietnamese guard drew a cross in the dirt and totally got what the guy was trying to say because JMC, not that egghead Obama with his longterm solutions, is more than a man of action. He is an action painter. You know, like Jackson Pollock. His coherency is in his movement and today he is a tax-cutting guy who also wants to balance the budget and hold Wall Street greedheads accountable for destroying your 401-K. Contradictions? Contradictions are for squares. 

In the crazy mixed-up world we have inherited this political season, this kind of whirling dervish routine might just carry him over the finish line if it weren’t for the party that he is tied to. Sure, he stirred up the base with his choice of Sarah Palin (who is in NY, meeting a dozen world leaders, AND Bono, all in one day — talk about action!) but those people bring the votes, not the bread. The moneybags in the Republican Party really don’t want to hear him do his Huey Long impression. While he and his rival are both skeptical of the government’s proposal to give the Treasury Secretary a blank check, and no one to answer to, Obama sounds more prudent and determined to help craft the right compromise to get us out of this mess and keep the ship of state afloat. McCain’s tossing paint, man — and the red ink might just fall on us.

The Bi-Polar Kid

No, I’m not talking about the fine piece by Jennifer Egan about manic-depressive children in last Sunday’s Times magazine. I am talking here of John McCain, a man who is changing positions so fast that he must be giving himself whiplash. Does he look at himself at night and say, “Who am I this time?”

This isn’t about the sleazy ads but rather the tactics he once despised. The New Republic reports today that Republicans are using the kind of push polls that Rove & co. used to slander JMC in South Carolina in 2000. Those were about a black child he fathered out of wedlock. (The fact that there was no such child, and the child in question was his daughter adopted from Bangladesh, didn’t stop the racists from running from him.) The polls they are using against Obama ask Jewish voters if it would bother them to learn Hamas supported Obama, and other “statements of fact” sure to put off a few Jews. Though the group behind the polling does not work for McCain, that is the way these groups play. I can already hear JMC defending them as factually accurate, as he did the ad accusing Obama of wanting to teach sex ed to kindergarden kids

And now the longtime regulation foe is out there trying to reinvent himself as a regulator in disguise. He’s a tough guy, he claims in a new ad, ready to “clean up Wall Street,” when only two days ago he was telling reporters more regulation just meant more bureaucrats, and you know how they are. 

Will it play? How stupid are voters? The last eight years might lead you to think: pretty stupid. But even as my Democratic friends on both coasts are wringing their hands and pointing at comets in the sky, a number of conservatives are saying it’s Obama’s election to lose. David Brooks and Rich Lowry were deeply unimpressed with Sarah Palin’s performance on ABC last week, and Carl Cannon (who keeps his political affiliation well hidden) just wrote a bracing blog on the Readers Digest site saying, in essence, the polls are missing the youth of today. And the youth will decide this thing for the Dems. 

And that was before this weekend, when Wall Street imploded and the Dow began to tank. Suddenly the  Palin pick looks a little less like genius; after hearing her make fun of people with a “big fat resume,” a lot of shaken voters would like some reassurance from people who have been saying for a while that the government needs to be more involved in the financial markets. Now resumes look good, especially if they point to politicians who didn’t look the other way when the bus was headed for the cliff.